Building Respect and Trust

Why do so many managers and safety professionals keep treating the people in organizations as objects to be controlled so they will work safely?

They seem to assume that the employees can’t or won’t think for themselves and have to be made to work safely. These managers and safety professionals are not bad people, but they are stuck in their basic assumptions about people. So many seem to think that they have the answers and the power to make people do as they are told.

Thinking of the people as “employees” is part of the problem. Thinking of people as “employees” brings different thoughts to mind. The word “employee” is a legal word that defines my relationship with my employer with respect to things like hours of work, pay rates, benefits, etc. It also carries some tough top-down implications. If the boss gives an order, it better be done. The boss and the employee are not seen as equals in terms of respect, hopes, aspirations, good ideas and creative energy.

safety focus building respect and trust

This has been the approach for generations and yet, there are still over 6,000 people a year getting killed at work and thousands are suffering serious injuries. Just using the same approach, with variations, over and over, and expecting to see real improvements is a problem!

There needs to be a fundamental shift to assumptions like these.

My Safety Focus: Building Respect and Trust.

My basic assumptions are:

  • We work with people who have brains and can think; their hopes and dreams are similar to my own.
  • People do want to work safely and not get hurt.
  • People want to be treated with respect.
  • The people doing the work have important knowledge and ideas to contribute.
  • People want to be listened to.
  • I do not know what they know, so we need to share information together so we can do our best.
  • Safety is connected to everything we do; it is part of the whole system.
  • It takes everyone pulling together to achieve excellence.
  • I do not have a right to make my living at a place where it is okay for people to get hurt.

I did not work on safety as such. My focus was on the people and building trust and a better, safer future. The more I worked this way with the people, the better our performance became. Within 4 years, our Total Injury Rate had dropped by about 97% to a rate of about 0.3. (The rate was only a way to keep score.) The people liked working this way and sustained their performance for 19 years. I wrote about this in my recently published paper in Professional Safety [Knowles, R.N. (2022, Nov.). Leading vs. Managing: A tale of two organizational processesProfessional Safety, 67(11), 42-46].

The importance of building trust and working with people has been known for a long time. Douglas McGregor wrote The Human Side of Enterprise in 1960 about Theory X and Y. Recently the work of others like Rosa Carrillo in her book, The Relationship Factor in Safety Leadership, 2020, and even in this current issue of Professional Safety [ Sarkus, D.J. (2022, Nov.). Building community through servant leadership. Professional Safety, 67(11), 24-29.] are emphasizing the importance of respect and trust.

This shift in thinking and working with the people results in a lot fewer people getting hurt or killed at work. Yet why do so many safety people seem to be all wrapped up in chasing injuries and incidents? Some just counting the numbers. Others developing more advanced ways to get employees to work more safely, or to develop better ways to analyze incident situations. Many are just pushing production with little or no regard for safety. Some safety consultants have learned to give great motivational talks that are fun to hear, but have almost no impact in the workplace. The BLS statics on workplace injuries and deaths are not showing much improvement.

The global safety improvement industry was estimated to be over $20,000,000. The trade shows have lots of very fancy safety equipment and the consultants are selling their approaches. Is there a vested interest it doing things like we have always do it and getting the same results?

Many managers think that you can not have excellence in safety and earnings at the same time. That is not what I found at the plant I led where we cut the injury rate by 97% and increased the earnings by 300%.

safety focus building respect and trust

Conclusion

If the whole safety effort was shifted to treating people with respect, listening and learning together and doing what makes sense, there would be a huge improvement in total safety and a lot fewer people getting injured and killed.

Is the effort to build trust, learn to treat people with respect, to listen more carefully, to build on each other’s good ideas too high a price for saving many, many lives?

What will it take to make the shift?

Process Safety Management (PSM)…

Why Process Safety Management is needed and everyone needs to be Involved!

Week after week I read of explosions and fires at refineries, chemical plants and dust-producing operations like sawmills and grain elevators. There are usually people hurt or killed. Communities are forced to shelter in place or evacuate. Families suffer great loss. There are always estimates of the loss of money and the difficulty of getting back into production.

These are sad situations that are usually avoidable if the managers and engineers would only do their duty to conduct strong process safety management (PSM) work. PSM does require having trained engineers to do the work. It may require money when a defect is found the needs repair. It is often routine and boring work as in inspecting relief valves, for example. It often is narrowly focused on just the specific process without taking the whole system into mind. This is critical work that responsible managers and engineers need to conduct rigorously. It is a necessary discipline. (Process Safety Management came about as OSHA’s response to prevent a disaster like Bhopal).

everyone should be involved in process safety management

When I read the reports of these disasters, there are often long explanations about things. There was one I read about where the fluctuating liquid levels in distillation columns were unstable and causing the operators continuous problems. The instruments were not showing the full nature of the problem of the rising liquid levels which, one day, got so out of control that the distillation column overflowed, releasing a flammable cloud which ignited and killed a lot of people. The incident investigation discussed all sorts of technical problems which were not addressed since they did not look too serious. But they did not include the whole system.

Nowhere was there any discussion mentioned about what the operators were experiencing each day and struggling to control. It was clear that they had a serious problem, but no one asked them about it. Why do the technical people treat the men and women who operate the facilities as if they did not know anything. These people live with the processes! They have a lot to offer!

When I was the Plant Manager of the big DuPont Belle, West Virginia plant, we brought occupational safety, occupational health, and PSM together as a whole safety system effort where each part helped the other parts. We created the conditions where people felt it was okay to talk openly together about the problems and address them. Where they helped each other. Trust was built so people could be able to do their best. The people came together enabling us all to perform much better.

Our Total Recordable Injury rate dropped by 97% to ~0.3 and our total emissions to the environment dropped by 95% in just 3 years. I look at total emissions to the environment as a key PSM metric since there is less waste from poorly running processes and fewer upsets or failures blowing stuff into the air.

Building trust and interdependence among the people is a very important part of management’s work. It is easy to do this using the Cycle of Intelligence, listening and learning together. Rosa Carrillo has written a fine book about the importance of the Relationship Factor entitled “The Relationship Factor in Safety Leadership.” This is easy to do if we just go into our organizations, share information, listen, and learn together. It would have avoided the disaster I mentioned earlier in this newsletter.

Yet most managers do not get out of their offices, talk with the people sharing information, listening, and learning together. Why is this? Rosa’s work and my work clearly show the great benefits to safety and productivity, yet managers shy away from this.

WHY????

In your own organization, what are you doing to open up and share information? What are you doing to open up a safe space where it is okay for people to talk and share? Are you bringing a diverse group of people together to talk and learn?

Each of us can make a positive difference. Will you?

osha process safety management elements

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.

Close